October 3, 1999
Today in the Sunday Morning session of LDS
General Conference, President Gordon B. Hinckley, revered by his fellow Mormon
followers as their Prophet and mouthpiece for God himself, addressed the issue
that has become nearly an obsessive common focus of the entire planet -- Y2K.
This General Conference marks the last that will be held this century prior
to the turning of the clock on midnight of December 31, from the year 1999 to
the year 2000, when some computers will interpret the "00" in their
still two-digit date slot to mean 1900, creating conflicts of data, locking up
of software, malfunctioning of machines controlled by these computers, and
secondary glitches in the computers reliant on the errant computers.
Minus some divine revelation, no one will know for certain how widespread
the disruption will be from this man-made boondoggle until the clocks actually
turn one at a time through the 24 time zones compassing the earth this coming
New Years Eve, now just 89 days away.
Huge expenditures of money, time, and resources have been poured into the
Y2K problem in order to address the most crucial vulnerabilities. Yet
because of the interconnectivity of the world's computer systems as well as
the interdependent world, nation, state, community, corporate economy which
now rides on the back of the computer, even small glitches can have tremendous
rippling effects.
Prognostication as to the outcome has been controversial. On one
hand, some have predicted only minor glitches which can be soon fixed but
which will not overly disrupt the main flow of society. On the other
extreme, there are a significant number of people who anticipate the end of
the world as we know it. Still others anticipate prolonged disruption
from which we will gradually, with difficulty, recover.
Previously silent on the issue, on the eve of the millennium, the Mormon
prophet has now spoken officially on the topic, making it the subject of his
remarks to the body of the Church in the semi-annual conference broadcast to
all the world.
In Mormon theology, such pronouncements are looked upon as akin to the mind
and will of the Lord, binding upon the members of the church and representing
the direction of God to them.
What did the Mormon prophet have to say this morning?
He began his talk by acknowledging the presence of Senator Robert Bennett,
R-Utah and LDS, who has become famous nationally and even internationally for
his incessant yet tempered voice of warning regarding Y2K.
President Hinckley then used this as an introduction to the topic of Y2K,
mentioning that it has been the subject on everyone's mind -- a subject he
would like to now address.
He then proceeded to overview world history from a religious
standpoint. He began by focusing on the life of the Savior, Jesus
Christ, who established His gospel here on the earth. That gospel was
subsequently lost in its purity from the earth as the early Christian church
fell away into darkness, Hinckley continued. This was followed by the
long night of the Dark Ages, which haze began to lift with the Renaissance and
its introduction of the age of enlightenment. Then with the
establishment of freedom of religion in America, the stage was set for the
restoration of the pure gospel of Jesus Christ through the prophet Joseph
Smith. A new and final dispensation had dawned. The gospel, along
with the Priesthood of God and the keys to administer God's kingdom had been
restored, no more to be taken from the earth.
Having said that, President Hinckley was now ready to make his point
regarding Y2K, which he never mentioned specifically other than at the
beginning of his address.
He spoke of "what a glorious day this is" in which we live.
He referred to Joseph Smith's restoring the gospel as being in fulfillment of
Daniel's prophecy of a stone that would be cut out of the mountain without
hands, which would then roll forward and fill the whole earth.
Joseph's day was the day of the stone being cut out of the mountain,
according to Hinckley, and this day of tremendous Church growth and favor in
the world, coming out of obscurity, is now the day in which it is rolling
forward to fill the whole earth with nothing to stop or hinder it in its
progress. I think it safe to assert from his context that he intended to
imply that this included Y2K.
In the final paragraphs of his talk he spoke of continued growth, continued
improvement, continued enlargement, which in the context of addressing Y2K
implied that it would not be a significant setback either for the church or
for the world.
Quote:
Indicative of the "growth, and improvement, and enlargement" of
which President Hinckley speaks, beginning next April, the conference will be
convened at the new massive assembly building, which will seat 21,000.
If President Hinckley has concerns about Y2K, he obviously does not believe
the problems that may arise will hinder in any way the already stretched
construction schedule, employing 1,000 workers each day, which targets to
complete the new Conference Center sufficient by April 2000 to convene general
conference there.
"If present plans hold, this will be the last time we meet in this
historic tabernacle for General Conference," he said in the afternoon
session, celebrating that building's construction, history, and other
memories.
The new building, he said, is "designed to the highest construction
codes," including seismic considerations.
I wonder how it will fare in the once-in-many centuries earthquake that
will eventually (soon?) rock the valley? Will the earthquake spare the
structure, even as the recent tornado just grazed the edge of temple square,
while toppling the construction crane over the new center?
In light of reams of prophecy regarding latter-day purgings of the Lord's
people, such a mild prediction for Y2K and optimism for the brightness of the
immediate future is as daring to make as the other extreme of warning of dire
calamities.
Many, including myself, believe that the prophecies paint a very grueling
picture of what lays immediately ahead for this people, including likely
effects of Y2K, thrust on a people who will turn into ravening creatures when
the comforts to which they have become so accustomed are suddenly removed.
If these pending chastening destructions (of which Y2K is but one of many)
are diminished or even turned away, it will be because of the sincere
repentance of the people, not because such destructions never threatened in
the first place.
To instill such repentance do we assure people, "All is well. Carry
on, higher and higher," or do we point out the pending consequences of
man's foolishness, so that they might turn to God and live?
My reading of the scriptures points to the latter.
The beginnings of the kingdom of which Daniel spoke were indeed commenced
with Joseph Smith, but that kingdom of which he spoke was not a church, it was
a righteous government.
The saints gave up their quest for a government of God as a condition for
receiving statehood prior to the turn of the century.
Ever since then, they have called the "church" the
"kingdom," which is a misnomer.
Meanwhile, the kingdom of Satan, also called the New World Order, which is
international socialism, has gained the upper hand and succored many even
within the highest ranks of the LDS and other churches to sympathize with and
even embrace its offerings.
Consistent with prophecy about the "Drunkards of Ephraim"
"in the head of the fat valleys," even "the prophet"
"errs in vision and stumbles in judgment." (Isaiah 28.)
So when President Hinckley implies that Y2K is of no concern, but that the
church and even society will continue to climb onward and upward; rather than
be consoled, I am more alarmed.
His soothing and reassuring voice will put people to sleep rather than
awaken them to a sense of our awful situation, which vigilance is crucial to
stirring up adequate repentance so that such terrible calamities might be
avoided.
His saying that nothing will happen may very well be the reason why it will
happen.
This illustrates the need to place our trust foremost in God, not in man,
even if that man be called to serve as the president of his earthly
church. If our focus is on God, we can honestly ask ourselves if the
immediate future is indeed bright, as he portrays, or if the enemy is nigh
unto crushing us, which is what is really the case; and God can confirm to our
souls -- independent of any man -- the truth, so that we might awake and put
on strength and not be caught unawares.
Does God want a people who will follow a prophet -- one man, who is the arm
of flesh -- in this case a blind optimist -- or does he want a nation of
prophets.
"Would to God that all were prophets," is the clarion call.
Choose you this day whom you will serve, e.g. follow and believe and
support: God or man.
As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.
I'm getting ready for Y2K and am doing the most I can to help others get
ready as well, in hopes that by being sufficiently prepared, it will not be
the calamity that it would be otherwise.
That was the lesson of Joseph of Egypt -- whose namesake the modern
Ephraimites should emulate and against which they should not rebel. The
rebellious of Ephraim will be cut off from among the Lord's people in the day
of wrath (e.g. when the consequences of our foolishness come to haunt
us). (D&C 64.)
May we be each stand independent before the Lord, being responsible for our
own salvation with him, and not place our trust in another, lest we fall.
There is one sure foundation upon which man can build, and that is Christ.
I commend this foundation to all.
Sincerely,
Sterling D. Allan
http://www.GreaterThings.com
new scripture word studies
http://www.JosephPrep.com
preparedness in the spirit of Joseph of Egypt