In an Instant Suddenly -- ET Influence in Pending Transformation of Society

by Sterling D. Allan
Dec. 15, 2004

JJ,

I finally had a chance to read through your series of installments on exotheology, and I have a few comments in reply, mainly as it pertains to what is often referred to as "end times" because it is the end of one era and the beginning of another.

You stated, "The only real federations in the galaxy are the two brotherhoods who are not connected in the dense physical."

That sounds pretty galactic to me -- and divisive -- light versus dark. The eternal struggle. Each has their disciples on the physical plane, manifesting that struggle on the physical plane. There is a galactic struggle.

Just as God allowed the incoming settlers of the Americas to plow down the natives who resided here, I would think that it would not be outside the realm of possibility that the superintending God council could allow the explorers of the next frontier -- space -- to have their way with us, and for those of a more benevolent nature to be able to intercede on our behalf.

I agree that we as inhabitants are the ones who steer our destiny by the collective choices that we make, and that the superintending God council likewise steers things in such a way to (1) allow our consequences to be answered upon us, for good and for ill, as well as (2) prevent things from happening to us that are above our ability to endure; which process has the effect of promoting our growth and development by the lessons we learn.

Why would God bless us with such incredible knowledge of the universe and a burgeoning ability to traverse the distances of space (there is good reason to believe some of the UFO sightings are of craft made by man) if there was not a plan in the wings to induct us into an extra planetary commerce?

Now, to another comment you made. You said in essence that the great transformation anticipated by the LDS, as well as most Christians, the returning of the earth to its paradisiacal state, "will not happen as expected," but will be more of a gradual change spanning centuries. You make the point that our level of advancement today would seem like Eden to one living a couple of millennia ago.

I take strong exception with this model. It contradicts a myriad of consistent and replete prophetic themes.

The prophecies describe our consequential destructions coming "in an instant suddenly." One day things are relatively tranquil, then WHAM, the next thing we know, life as we have known it has been turned up-side-down. Satan has his way with the world for a brief chapter, then, when it would seem all is lost, and the Lord's people have been humbled to their core (realizing that the destruction was something they should have prevented but didn't), a great deliverance will be answered upon that humility. "A nation shall be born in a day."

That is no gradual transformation. It is an even that we will be able to engrave in our calendars and memorialize for generations to come. It will mark the turning point when we finally collectively came to our senses.

There is a "Sabbath" era coming on the world to coincide with the Sabbath of the edenic state that ended approximately 6,000 years ago. One thousand years of man is as one day for the Lord, meaning we are on the eve of our Sabbath era. Though the interpretation of such a turning point hitting us on the stroke of midnight 2000 came and went without the much anticipated "end of the world as we know it," does not mean that such a turning point will not come at all.

There are a myriad of scenarios that could cause the meltdown point to materialize. I agree with you that we as a civilization decide collectively by our choices just which scenario will actually come into play, and that we can defer certain scenarios that are more disastrous than others by our collective will. I also agree that the severity of such scenarios can be mitigated if society collectively learns its lessons by precept, negating the need to learn by hard experience.

But there is a collective awakening event slated for us -- a day we will be able to mark on our calendars for generations to come.

Now, on to another point you made. You talked about "the coming ice age," as being a likely cataclysmic event that you expect within 150 - 200 years, which will give "time to prepare for gathering the lights into floating cities on the oceans where they will be out of harm's way of this and other earth changes."

I have a bit of a hard time buying the notion that the oceans will be a safe harbor when the earth is reeling too and fro. I don't think that is where one would want to be. The engineering required to hold a structure steady through such huge upheavals (tidal waves, winds, torrents of rain) is most likely beyond the scope of what we could manifest. Imagine the destructive force of a hurricane when it hits land. It packs more power than a nuclear bomb, many times over, and that is at a stage when it slows down. Imagine what such storms would be like at sea -- and add to that the additional strength caused by "mega-storms" that we anticipate to happen with increasingly regularity and ferocity as the earth changes take place.

No, I don't think a city on the ocean is the answer for safety in the coming days -- and certainly not for the ice age scenario you specifically mentioned, which would be marked by cataclysmic oceanic upheavals.

Another point in your treatise touched on the cities of Enoch, etc..., that were "taken up." You gave your opinion that these did not entail the actual physical real estate, dirt and all, leaving the planet, but was one person at a time ascending away.

I realize that it is hard for our scientifically trained minds to imagine how a large chunk of earth the size of the gulf of Mexico (city of Enoch?) or of the Mediterranean (city of Salem?) to be taken from the planet (these chunks are "missing pieces" from plate tectonics puzzle), but I'm sure, if this is what did happen, there are advanced laws of physics that were applied, and that a return of these land masses will likewise follow similar laws and will be possible. [As a side note, the earth that is now divided, from the days of Peleg, is supposed to return to one land mass. That is going to be no small cataclysm, possibly taking place when the earth does its pole shift. Again, I don't think a city on the ocean is the place to be for safety at that time. Raised up above the clouds will be a good place to sit that one out, and the dust will not be settling in a couple of hours. We're going to need to eat, and sleep, go to the restroom -- and so will the animals that we might decide to take with us .... An argument for another craft like Noah's ark -- this time for the earth's baptism of fire.]

Your second to last paragraph is highly profound -- and actually contradicts the thrust of your response.

"One of the dangers we face on earth, because of the little assistance we have received [from light/dark brotherhood, or E.T.s is not specified], is that we now have the capacity to blow ourselves into the stone age but not the maturity to insure we will exercise the proper self control to move safely into the new age."

If that extent of "assistance" (aka intervention) has taken place to such far-reaching consequences, then it would stand to reason that additional intervention would be both allowed and warranted to counteract the consequences that are more than humans could handle alone.

Finally, while your point about much of the ET information that circulates is bogus, do to contrivings of people's imagination, is a good point, I think your dismissing 99% of these reports is overkill.

In my humble estimation, one of the primary reasons for increased UFO sightings and ET interactions since around 1947 was because the earth became the subject of increased ET activity as a result of our galactic smoke signal sent when we began detonating atomic bombs.

That brought us into their ball game. They have a vested interest in not letting us blow ourselves up, and in not detonating our planet.

That, you must concede, is a compelling reason for increased activity and interest from our neighbors in the galaxy. It means we are skirting technology that can take us to the stars, and that if we would do it here, we have it in us to also do it somewhere else.

Like a parent responding to a child playing with a gun from the gun closet, they came rushing to the scene to make sure things do not get out of hand.

Sterling

See also