Sooner or Later, the time comes when people find it necessary to reject the government that
rules over them and demand respect for the sovereignty to which they are, by their very nature,
entitled. Consideration for everyone affected compels them to explain the reasons for the change.
It is obvious that every individual is free and independent and has certain basic rights -- for
example; the right to live peacefully and honestly, and to pursue whatever ends he (or she) sees
as being in his own best interests so long as he doesn't interfere with the equal rights of
everyone else.
The only legitimate purpose of government is to ensure that no one violates anyone else's
rights. Therefore, a just government can only serve those people who voluntarily support it.
Whenever any form of government exceeds its legitimate authority and begins destroying the very
values it was instituted to protect, it is the right of the people to either change it or abolish
it, and to set up a new government designed in such a way that its power is strictly limited to
its proper functions. Of course, common sense says such drastic steps should not be taken except
in extreme circumstances. And, historically, people will tolerate a great deal of oppression
rather than change a system with which they have grown familiar and comfortable. But, when a long
series of abuses, invariably pursuing the same goal, demonstrates a plan to reduce them to virtual
slavery, it is their right (indeed, it is their duty!) to reject such government and institute a
new system to provide for their future security.
Such is the situation in which Americans now find themselves and the reason they must, once
again, demand emancipation from a dictatorial government. The history of the present government is
a history of insidious and incessant erosion of rights which has resulted in an absolute tyranny
over the lives and property of the good people of this country.
The evidence is overwhelming:
* It has made absolute the power of the majority to rule over individuals, and by
legislation, executive order, and judicial decree has created and encouraged a system which
rewards indolence and penalizes productive effort.
* It has redefined fundamental rights as privileges and required people by regulations and
licensing restrictions to obtain its permission merely to be left in peace to trade honorably in
the marketplace.
* It has outlawed numerous peaceful, honest activities and occupations and, in areas not
entirely prohibited, required free citizens to give up some of their rights in order to enjoy
others - rights which are priceless to honest people and a danger only to despots.
* It has created a massive bureaucracy with unending reporting requirements in order to bury
our people in forms and paperwork and, thereby, wear them down and beat them into submission.
* It has harassed, jailed, and murdered individuals who bravely resisted its invasions of
their rights.
* In single-minded pursuit of its goal to reduce free people to abject slaves, it has failed
utterly in its responsibility to protect people from criminal aggression.
* It has severely restricted the freedom of individuals living under other oppressive
governments to move here to seek refuge and the opportunity to be freely productive and,
thereby, contribute to the betterment of all.
* It has caused the judiciary to degenerate into a kangaroo court of arbitrary powers that is
a mockery of justice.
* It has made its own courts arbiter of disputes to which it is itself a party.
* It has created innumerable new offices and administrative and regulatory bodies sending
forth swarms of officers and agents to harass our people and devour the fruits of their labor.
* It has maintained, even in times of peace, a standing military force of frightening and
wholly unnecessary proportions.
* It has made both military and police forces superior to and beyond the control of civilian
authority.
* It has imposed upon us laws and edicts which are abhorrent to a free people:
* Maintaining large numbers of armed agents among us far beyond what is needed to assist
individuals in their self-defense.
* Imposing the doctrine of Governmental Immunity to insulate its agents from responsibility
for their wanton and reckless acts.
* Restricting our trade both among ourselves and with other people around the world.
* Imposing taxes without our consent.
* Undermining and finally destroying the jury trial - a free people's last defense against a
dictatorial government.
* Conscripting free individuals into involuntary servitude in the military to have life and
limb wasted in pointless foreign wars.
* Abolishing the concept of private property and the rights implicit in self-ownership by
arbitrary rules, regulations, ordinances, and codes in a relentless expansion of its domination
and control over the lives of free people.
* Taking away our most cherished freedoms including the rights to life, liberty, and the
peaceful, honest pursuit of happiness.
* Declaring itself invested with the power to legislate for us in all matters whatsoever,
even including how our children shall be raised and educated.
* It has abdicated its responsibility by ignoring victims of aggression and, instead, naming
itself complainant in criminal cases, all the while preying on honest people for its support by
violence and extortion.
* It has plundered our wealth, corrupted our money, and far exceeded its income, creating a
massive debt impossible to legitimately retire.
* It has raised up large armies of mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation,
and tyranny already begun with a cruelty and ruthlessness scarcely paralleled in the most
barbarous age, and totally unworthy of the government of a civilized nation.
* It has employed our fellow citizens to bear arms against us, to become the extortionists
and executioners of their friends and families, or to fall themselves to government
intimidation.
* It has caused domestic discontent and has recklessly challenged other dictatorial powers
(such as the government of the Soviet Union whose known method of conquest is an undistinguished
destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions), threatening to bring nuclear annihilation down
on us in defense of foreign governments.
In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms.
Our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A government whose character is
thus marked by every act which may define a dictatorship, is unfit to rule over a free people.
Nor have we neglected to admonish our fellow citizens We have warned them many times of
attempts by this government to extend an unjustified jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them
of the principles which formed the foundation of this republic. We have appealed to their sense of
goodness and justice, and we have begged them in the name of our common heritage to disavow this
renegade government that is leading us inexorably to our doom. However, they have been deaf to the
voice of reason and fairness.
We must, therefore, of necessity, hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war,
until such time as they renounce the initiation of force and, thereby, demonstrate their peaceful
intentions so that we may once again consider them friends in peace.
We, therefore, as sovereign individuals living in the United States of America, together and
singly, relying on the justice of our cause, solemnly publish and declare that we are, and of
right ought to be, free and independent people; that we are absolved from all allegiance to the
United States Government, and that all political connection between us and the Government of the
United States is, and ought to be, totally dissolved; and that as free and independent people we
have the full power to defend ourselves, make alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other
acts and things which independent people may, by right, do. And for the support of this
declaration, with a firm belief in the inevitability of a social order whose highest value is the
non-initiation of force, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred
honor.
====================================================== [Editor's Note: Karl Hess; Editor of the
LP News] As you have probably guessed by now, the document you have just read is a faithful
paraphrase of the Declaration of Independence of the colonial states of America. It was prepared by
a libertarian activist and freelance writer, Timothy J. O'Brien, of Troy, MI. In past experiments,
when the original text has been circulated to American audiences, the overwhelming response has been
one of rejection. At an American air base, for instance, most of the people who were asked to sign
the declaration refused and gave as their reason their belief that the document was radical,
revolutionary - and communist! The paraphrased version, using more modern language and omitting
clearly dated references or bringing them accurately up to date, undoubtedly would strike many
people as downright treasonous. And, of course, when the original was published it was treasonous.
Yet, think carefully about it: Isn't it a valid, if extreme, statement of the way many citizens
could reasonably be expected to view their own government these days? Is not that government, in
many areas, literally at war with its own citizens? To be sure, America remains the most free nation
on earth. It remains for many people of the earth a steady and beckoning beacon of hope and freedom
and opportunity. But, on balance, wouldn't it be prudent to revive the spirit of our original
Declaration of Independence? And isn't that declaration most perfectly reflected, these days, in the
positions of the Libertarian Party, and in the principles of the libertarian movement? How would
your neighbors react to a request to sign the Declaration of Independence today - particularly our
modernized version? Could this be a way to "feel out" politics in your area? Could this
document be used as a support for your own libertarian statements if they are attacked as being too
radical?
It is offered here for whatever uses you can make of it - or simply to test your own politics.
Would you sign this document? Would you have signed the original? And aren't these truly basic
questions for any American? Above all, this reminder of our American heritage is meant as a reminder
also of the reflection of that heritage in the Libertarian Party and in the libertarian movement.
I like the spirit of the document. It is quite similar to the one I penned. [Declaration
of Independence Parallel to Our Day]
However, I would not sign it at this time, and here is why.
I believe that we have not reached that stage where revolution is justified. The
reason? The Constitution, though impaired, yet hangs by a thread. Our freedoms are yet
sufficiently protected, that we would not be justified to rise up in revolution against our
government.
For example, the document makes reference to the Fed. Govt.. taking over and subverting our
public education. However, we are still free to home school our children or send them to a
private school, where we may teach them as we please.
Another example. Though it is true that the government is out of hand in its taxation
methods, yet it is still possible for one to remove himself from the system -- though it is very
difficult.
That is why the declaration of restoration that I wrote does not call for revolution but for an
earnest seeking to return to the moorings of freedom from which we have severely strayed.
If the time should come that our freedoms -- both in the fringe as well as in the mainstream --
become severed, then would be the time that revolt would be justified. For example, if the
government were to declare Marshall law unlawfully for the purpose of removing those final
freedoms.
Sterling D. Allan
July 5, 1999
